Stakeholder theory: Some revisionist suggestions
نویسنده
چکیده
The article argues for the use of a narrow stakeholder definition. It also adds one group –managers – that generally is not considered as being a stakeholder group. Here it is suggested that control of this stakeholder group holding the executive power should be a central topic for stakeholder theory. The article supports the common idea that the business discourse and the moral discourse should be integrated in stakeholder theory, not treated as separate tracks. The issue is then how to mold the substance for such integration. This article argues that the priority of stakeholders implies a distancing from general altruistic philosophy that argues against – not for – giving special consideration to the company’s stakeholders. Both the moral substance and the business potential lie in the special and close relationship with these partners. Stakeholder theory needs a more compatible ethical theory. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Not for citation without authors permission REVISIONIST PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY*
Introduction In a recent essay Christiano (2004) coined a distinction between 'mainstream' and 'revisionist' rational choice political theory, and cast us in the role of revisionist theorists 1. While we disagree with some aspects of Christiano's argument 2 , we broadly accept our designated role as revisionist public choice theorists. The major purposes of this brief paper are to provide a sum...
متن کاملInvestigating the Ethical and Legal Bases of the Central Beneficiary and the Central Shareholder in Joint Stock Companies
Background: Today, commercial activities have become more complex and complex than in the past, and for this reason, it has become a category with more sensitivities. One of the dimensions of trade sensitivity in the present age is related to the type of allocation of trade interests and beneficiaries of these interests. In the past, only family businesses and businesses benefited from the bene...
متن کاملThe Discourse of a Large Scale Organizational Transformation: The Reengineering of IBM, 1989-1994
In this paper we examine an organizational discourse on radical transformation by identifying and analyzing management narratives claiming to be representative of different organizational stakeholders. We do this from the perspective of Stakeholder Agency Theory (Hills and Jones 1996) and by employing analytical approaches typical of hermeneutics, historical analysis and the sociology of action...
متن کاملStakeholder Capitalism, Corporate Governance and Firm Value∗
We consider the advantages and disadvantages of stakeholder-oriented firms that are concerned with employees and suppliers as well as shareholders compared to shareholderoriented firms. Societies with stakeholder-oriented firms have higher prices, lower output, and can have greater firm value than shareholder-oriented societies. In some circumstances, firms may voluntarily choose to be stakehol...
متن کاملReshaping the Stakeholder Model: Insights from Negotiated order Theory
The need to complement the existing stakeholder theory with more dynamic perspectives has been acknowledged for some time. This article uses the insight from negotiated order theory to provide a more actor oriented and dynamic illustration of the stakeholder understanding by adapting the classic Freeman model, strengthening its pedagogical value. Adopting a hermeneutic approach, the model is bu...
متن کامل